Tuesday, March 24, 2015

Rules of Procedure

The Next Elements will be the Rules of Procedure for  St. John's Model of United Nations

Points and Motions

1. Motion to Set The Agenda
2. Motion to Set the Speakers List
3. Motion to Set (Extend) the Speakers Time
Random Order 
Motion to Open an Extraordinary Session of 2 (#) Questions to the Delegation of "NAME of the Country" 

Motion to Open a Moderated Caucus for the Time Expression of (#)10 minutes. 

Motion to Open an Unmoderated Caucus for the Time Expression of (#) 15 Minutes. To start elaborating the resolution paper points.  

Motion to Suspend the meeting for 30 min and Open a Moderated Caucus to establish the blocks during this session of comments and questions among delegations. 

Motion to Table debate for 20 min. 

Motion to Adjourn the meeting.   (Till the next session is Set). 

Motion to Close the Debate and pass to read the Resolutions already established by the blocks. 


Points

 Point of Order  

Point of Information

Point of Inquiry  

Point of Personal Privilege 

Examples on how to speak during the Debate
ž “Honorable Chair, (Country Name) moves to suspend the meeting for the purpose of a moderated/ caucus to discuss landmines for 25 minutes, with a 1 minute speaking time.
OR
žHonorable Chair, (Country Name) moves to
suspend the meeting for an un-moderated
caucus for 20 minutes”.
žHonorable Chair, (Country Name) moves to suspend debate and start a (un)moderated caucus for the time extension of 10 min…  ”.
Adjourn Meeting
žThe meeting ends until the next session.
žLunch or Dinner.
žTo pass the motion it should be voted by the majority of the delegates (51%).
“Honorable Chair, (Country Name) moves to adjourn the debate for the purpose of lunch”

Table Debate
žMakes a PAUSE on the current debated topic.
Moves to another topic and return to the first topic at a later time.
Two delegates must speak in favor of TABLING DEBATE and tow against.
To pass the motion it should be voted by two – thirds majority of the delegates 66%.
“Honorable Chair, (Country Name) moves to
table the topic of landmines to be discussed
at a later time”.
Close Debate
žOnce a delegate feels that his or her country's position has been made clear. That there are enough draft resolutions on the floor and that all other delegates are ready. He or she can move for the closure of debate.
žTo pass the motion it should be voted by two – thirds majority of the delegates (66%).
ž“Honorable Chair, (Country Name) moves for Closure of Debate on this topic”.

Appeal the chair´s decision
žA delegate feels that the chairperson has made an incorrect decision.
žThe appeal must be sent on paper (needs to be written).
žYou don't have to vote for it.
žHonorable Chair, (Country name) moves for an Appeal of the Chair (after a note has been accepted).

Point of order
žDelegates can use it when they believe a mistake in the procedure has been done in any way.
žThey should only specify the errors they believe were made in the MUN’s procedure.
žYou don't have to vote for it.
ž“Honorable Chair point of order the delegate of (Country’s name) referred to …”

Point of inquiry
žYou can use the POINT OF INQUIRY  when the floor is open, in order to ask the chair-person a question of the rules of procedure.
žYou don't have to vote for it.
ž“Honorable Chair, (Country Name) has a point of Inquiry.

Point of personal privilege
žYou can use the POINT OF PERSONAL PRIVILEGE when you want to inform the chairperson a physical discomfort.
žEg.
  Too much light=closing the curtains,
  Too much noise= closing the door or window.  
žYou don't have to vote for it
ž“Honorable Chair, (Country Name) has a
point of personal privilege, we cannot hear
the speaker, the room is too hot, etc…”

Point of information
After a delegate has given a speech in formal debate, he or she may yield time to points of information, or questions from other delegates concerning the speech. 
You don’t need to vote for it.
“Honorable Chair, (Country Name) has a point of information for the delegate”.
“Honorable Chair, (Country Name) yields to
points of information”.
OR
  “Honorable Chair, (Country Name) is open
to questions”.

General Assembly Topic: Freedom of Expression vs Internet Censorship

In Order for us to debate during the class we will consider the next topic: 

Freedom of Expression vs Internet Censorship among the World. 

St. John's students must find a possible resolution among countries to have an open media as possible for all people within countries and out to share, express and acquire the knowledge to take decisions for what would be best for them. 

the next material was selected to make your research easier and for you to develop your countries opinion in the matter as near from the reality as possible. 

Good luck and see you in Class. 


Right of freedom of expression, violence and censorship of the media

   Freedom of expression is one of the most fundamental rights that individuals enjoy. It is fundamental to the existence of democracy and the respect of human dignity. It is also one of the most dangerous rights, because freedom of expression means the freedom to express one's discontent with the status quo and the desire to change it. As such, it is one of the most threatened rights, with governments - and even human rights groups - all over the world constantly trying to curtail it.
   The United States, probably like no other nation, has recognized the importance of freedom of expression to safeguard democracy and grow as a nation. However, this does not mean there are no efforts to try to curtail it. The internet has often been the target of this efforts, as it provides practically everyone with the ability to communicate their ideas to wide audiences and escapes the ability of the state to control it.
T  his page is just being born, but in the future we hope to provide you with thorough information about what freedom of speech means, why it is important to protect it and what are the attempts to curtail it. Meanwhile we hope you find the information we do offer useful.
   Countries defending the right of freedom and expression
   Mainly USA, French and Germany are the ones who mainly protects this article.
    Countries violating the right of freedom and expression
   Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville,
Côte d'Ivoire, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon,
Laos, Mauritania, Rwanda, Togo, Tunisia, Vietnam, Angelia, Arabia Saudi, Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, China, Cuba, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia y Tunes

    Sources of information and research
·       Human rights. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://www.derechos.org/human-rights/speech/
·       Right of expression. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://issues.tigweb.org/expression
·       UNHRC session resolutions. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://www.ifex.org/sri_lanka/2012/02/28/unhrc_session/
·       Violations to the right of expression. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/4f4b6bf92.html
·       Annual Report of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights 2010 - Report of the Office of the Special Rapporteur for Freedom of Expression. Page consulted on February 28th. At: http://www.unhcr.org/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/refworld/rwmain?page=search&docid=4daeab852&skip=0&query=violations%20of%20the%20freedom%20of%20expression










 Privatization of the internet and censorship of the media
     Internet censorship is control or suppression of the publishing or accessing of information on the Internet. The legal issues are similar to offline censorship.
    One difference is that national borders are more permeable online: residents of a country that bans certain information can find it on websites hosted outside the country. Conversely, attempts by one government to prevent its citizens from seeing certain material can have the effect of restricting foreigners, because the government may take action against Internet sites anywhere in the world, if they host objectionable material.
    Barring total control on Internet-connected computers, such as in North Korea, total censorship of information on the Internet is very difficult (or impossible) to achieve due to the underlying distributed technology of the Internet. Pseudonymity and data havens (such as Freenet) allow unconditional free speech, as the technology guarantees that material cannot be removed and the author of any information is impossible to link to a physical identity or organization.

    These are the countries that are against the internet

    In 2006 the organization Reporters without Borders published a list of the 13 "enemies of the Internet" these countries only show certain information filtered to their population limiting their knowledge of information from the world
    These aren´t the only countries that filter the information before it arrives to their population many others countries also do it but in less scale than the countries previously mention.


   Level of privatization of the internet
   There are different levels of censorship: Pervasive, Substantial, and Nominal. Below are the countries that fall in the different categories.
   
  
    Pervasive

      Cuba

Iran 

Maldives 
Myanmar 
North Korea
People's Republic of China 
Syria 
Tunisia 
Uzbekistan 
Vietnam

    Substantial

      South Korea

Saudi Arabia 

United Arab Emirates 
Yemen
Qatar

    Nominal

      Australia

Brazil 

Canada 
Denmark 
European Union 
Fiji 
Finland 
France 
India 
Israel 
Italy 
Morocco 
Norway 
Pakistan 
Russia 
Singapore 
Sri Lanka 
Sweden 
Thailand 
Turkey 
United Kingdom 
United States of America



   Sources of information and research
·       Enemies of the internet. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://www.multilingualarchive.com/ma/enwiki/en/Internet_censorship#13_.22Enemies_of_the_Internet.22
·       Internet censorship. Page consulted on February 28th. At: http://www.internet-censorship.com/
·       About Internet Censorship. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://www.vpnaccounts.com/about-internet-censorship.html
·       Internet censorship. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://www.princeton.edu/~csl/internet-censorship.html
·       Internet censorship. Page consulted on February 28th. At:http://abcnews.go.com/topics/news/issues/internet-censorship.htm



Position Paper

Position Paper Elements


The following points are some of the questions that should be answered while doing your position paper.
Position Paper Elements 
Include a Cover with your Name, Group email and Country. 

5 Paragraph essay.
1. Recreational Drugs and its background. Name 10. 
2. What is my Country’s Position towards Recreational Drugs?
3. Which Countries agree with my Country's Point of view and what is the global conception towards recreational drugs? 
4. Which countries are against my country’s position? Clarify what is their global conception towards recreational drugs.  

5. What is my Point of View towards Recreational Drugs?

COVER PAGE


Committee

(B, Cambria 36)

Descripción: ttp:https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjlduMfrDDEYPd4xZe2-FGrsA4QRlv-a5-s_djj8uexuXM1JBZi6cEthaPaQDXrknlimXL3RK0605plAYl_z7_bZ-oSgHmzj4mYoYV6T1e-AcyeXsKbwBTy-ATHu__ebtGN8YgFMc51Kek/s1600/Netherland.pngCountry (B, Cambria 28)                    ( FLAG 5.4 cm X 3.9 cm)


(B, Cambria 12) Official name:

Population: (Information, R, Cambria 12)

Official language:

Religions:

Governors:

Main exports:

Main imports:  

Literacy rate:

IGP:

Member of UN since:




Delegate’s Name (Blacks, Cambria 16)
(School) Official Group
(ADVISOR) English Teacher
Grade: TA___  TB___



EXAMPLE OF COVER PAGE:





The following points are some of the questions that should be answered while doing your position paper.
Position Paper Elements
Include a Cover with your Name, Group email and Country.

5 Paragraph essay.
1. Recreational Drugs and its background. Name 10.
2. What is my Country’s Position towards Recreational Drugs?
3. Which Countries agree with my Country's Point of view and what is the global conception towards recreational drugs?
4. Which countries are against my country’s position? Clarify what is their global conception towards recreational drugs.  

5. What is my Point of View towards Recreational Drugs?
 We hope you have a very good inquiry on the road of making your essay! 

1st Paragraph 

Recreational Drugs and its Background:

What is the issue?
Talk about the different points of view regarding the issue. 
When did the issue start?
Who is held responsible for the situation ?


Why is this issue a conflict for the world?

What movements were originated worldwide?

2nd Paragraph (2nd in regular MUN's) 

Country's Present Situation:

According to the topic which is the position of the country I am representing?
Mention names of relevant people from my country, Social, Economical, media movements and dates.
What has been done in my country to solve this issue or to help others to deal with it within those countries?

3rd Paragraph  

What were the solutions proposed in the past in order to solve the problem?
Which countries  agree with yours? (Economically, Socially, Politically speaking) 

4th Paragraph  


 Which countries are against my country’s position? 

Clarify what is their global conception towards recreational drugs. 

5th Paragraph  Your conclusion. 

Proposals: Suggest a solution to solve the issue from your Country's view. Take into consideration your Country's economic status, culture, society and political situation.

Think about a coordinated solution with other countries and propose a strategy to solve the problem.

Which countries would you need to work with and what do they need to provide, for this solution to be done?

If possible, make a prospective time line needed to have evidence of the issues solution? 

Suggest which countries should follow your proposal. Make sure you explain why they should, ought or must stand by you on this, with facts. 

NOTE: If you have a name of a scientific project, you need to mention that name and the person in charge, explaining why you should follow this as a pilot project as part of your solution proposed. 

Be aware that every segment should have an extension of: 10 to 15 lines. 

Bibliography (Example) 
At least you will need 10 bibliographies in total. 

Southward R., 2008, Resuscitation Reading, ENGLISH TEACHINGProfessional, September, pp. 12.


You may follow the APA system as well.  Go to the next link for more information about this system of citation. 

-->
Position Paper Elements for the International Court of Justice

1st Segment

What is the issue?
Talk about the different points of view regarding the issue. (If there are 2 opposite countries).
When did the issue start?
Who is held responsible for the situation on each side?
In case there are two countries involved, What is the position of each one?
What solution are they proposing to solve the issue?


2nd Segment
Global Background:

Why is this issue a conflict for the world?
Which countries stood against and forth from the beginning?
What movements were originated worldwide?
Which countries supported them?
3rd Segment 

In this case, instead of talking about a present situation of a country, you must include your opinion as thinking you are the real judge on the court using the international laws that are already established in the world, you can support this segment by answering the following questions:
Which international laws are talking about this issue?
How can these laws affect the involved countries?

4th Segment (PAZMUN)

Global past solutions and Consequences :
What were the solutions proposed in the past in order to solve a situation like this?
What were the negative consequences according to the solutions done in the past?
Which countries were involved in the solution, when and how? (Economically, Socially, Politically speaking)
Which countries refused to be part of the solution and why?
Note: If the situation has not been resolved yet, you must search for solutions that have been established in similar cases.
Example: Topic A, you can find the information about the “Florence Cassez” case and know more regulations in extraditions.

5th Segment

Proposals:  Suggest solutions to solve the issue from the International Law’s view.

Think about a coordinated solution with other judges and propose a strategy to solve the problem.

Which countries would you need to work with and what do they need to provide, for this solution to be done?

Suggest which countries should follow your proposal. Make sure you explain why they should, ought or must stand by you on this, with facts.

Be aware that every segment should have an extension of: 10 to 15 lines. 

Bibliography (Example) 
At least you will need 10 bibliographies in total. 

Southward R., 2008, Resuscitation Reading, ENGLISH TEACHINGProfessional, September, pp. 12.


You may follow the APA system as well.  Go to the next link for more information about this system of citation. 


Example of a PP:

FORMAT
Page Configuration: Letter. 
SUBTITLES: 13
Rest of the document: Cambria 12
FLAG: 4cm x2.7cm
Sentences Per Segment 10 to 15. 


Print 2 Copies
Give one to your president's committee and the other to your teacher during the class.